Loading content...
On February 2, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a Statement of Interest urging the federal court to reject the proposed Alcazar v. Fashion Nova class settlement, arguing the deal pays attorneys $2.52M while delivering little real accessibility relief — and that even the claims-submission website was inaccessible to screen reader users.
Plaintiff
United States (Statement of Interest); Juan Alcazar (named class plaintiff)
Defendant
Fashion Nova, Inc. (and proposed class settlement)
Date Filed
February 2, 2026
Jurisdiction
United States District Court, Northern District of California
WCAG Level
Level AAOn February 2, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a Statement of Interest in Alcazar v. Fashion Nova, Inc. (N.D. Cal.), opposing the proposed class action settlement that had been pending before the court. A final approval hearing was held on February 12, 2026. The underlying case alleged that Fashion Nova, a California-based apparel retailer, operated an online store that was not accessible to blind shoppers using screen-reading software, in violation of Title III of the ADA and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act. Under the proposed settlement, Fashion Nova agreed to pay approximately $2.43 million to California class members (capped at $4,000 per household) and roughly $2.52 million in attorneys' fees and costs to plaintiffs' counsel, plus a commitment to modify its website "as needed" to substantially conform to WCAG 2.1. The DOJ argued the settlement should be rejected because: - The injunctive relief was a "mere recitation" of an existing ADA obligation, with no concrete remediation milestones, no specified WCAG conformance level, and no enforcement or monitoring mechanism. - Attorneys' fees ($2.52M) exceeded the recovery available to the class itself ($2.43M). - The website set up by class counsel for class members to submit claims was itself inaccessible to screen reader users — DOJ retained an expert who identified significant barriers that could cause class members to abandon the claims process. This Statement of Interest is widely viewed as a signal that the DOJ intends to take a more active role policing private accessibility settlements, scrutinizing both the substance of injunctive relief and the accessibility of class-administration tooling.
The Statement of Interest signals heightened federal scrutiny of digital accessibility class settlements and will likely reshape how plaintiffs' counsel structure injunctive relief, claims processes, and fee requests. Defendants negotiating accessibility settlements should expect demands for specific WCAG conformance levels, third-party audits, and accessible claim-submission infrastructure.