Loading...
Loading content...
Every accessibility-related lawsuit on TheWCAG that was filed in 2025, with status, defendant, jurisdiction, and a link to the full case summary.
Recent class action alleging the knife retailer's website barriers prevented a blind user from purchasing specific products, highlighting broken links and missing alt text.
Defendant: Buck Knives, Inc.Jurisdiction: United States (Federal Court)
Class action lawsuit alleging Rowing Blazers' e-commerce website is inaccessible to blind users, with significant barriers preventing navigation and transaction completion in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Defendant: Rowing Blazers Ltd.Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Lawsuit alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act by Wright County and the Minnesota Department of Human Services.
Defendant: Wright County, Minnesota and Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS)Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
DOJ lawsuit alleging Uber violated ADA by discriminating against passengers with disabilities through wait time fees and service refusals.
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc.Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court
First major European Accessibility Act enforcement actions by advocacy groups immediately after June 28, 2025 effective date, targeting major French supermarket chains.
Defendant: Auchan, Carrefour, E. Leclerc, Picard SurgelésJurisdiction: France (under European Accessibility Act)
Lawsuit alleging HP's website and affiliated platforms contain missing alternative text, broken ARIA references, unlabeled buttons, and inaccessible navigation menus that prevent blind users from independently engaging with its digital services.
Defendant: HP Inc.Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Lawsuit alleging Pete and Pedro's e-commerce website is inaccessible to blind users, preventing visually impaired individuals from accessing the men's grooming brand's products and services in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Defendant: Pete and Pedro, LLCJurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Landmark FTC action against accessibility overlay vendor accessiBe for deceptive marketing claims that their automated tool could make any website WCAG compliant within 48 hours.
Defendant: accessiBe Inc. & accessiBe Ltd.Jurisdiction: FTC Administrative (Federal Trade Commission)